The Rogerian argument finds that middle ground. Based on the work of psychologist Carl Rogers (pictured on the right), a Rogerian argument focuses on finding a middle ground between the author and the audience. This type of argument can be extremely persuasive and can help you, as a writer, understand your own biases and how you might work to find common ground with blogger.comted Reading Time: 2 mins Rogerian Method of Argumentation Use this outline if you are looking at two sides of an issue and want to reach a compromise with the point of view that is opposite yours. I. Introduction 1. State the problem you hope to resolve. 2. Explain the type of positive change you would like to see pertaining to this issue. blogger.com Size: 60KB Rogerian argument outline. To write the Rogerian argument format, it’s important to stick to this outline while you are writing: blogger.comuction: Stating the problem; Explaining positive points of the mentioned position; Indicating how a position is different from controversial views. Mentioning thesis. blogger.com points of opposing positions
Rogerian Argument Outline Research Paper | My Best Writer
This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue University. When printing this page, rogerian argument outline, you must include the entire legal notice. All rights reserved.
This material may not be published, rogerian argument outline, reproduced, broadcast, rewritten, rogerian argument outline, or redistributed without permission.
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our terms and conditions of fair use. The Rogerian argument or Rogerian rhetoric is a form of argumentative reasoning that aims to establish a middle ground between parties with opposing viewpoints or goals. For example, if you wanted to watch a comedy and your friend wanted to watch a romance, you might compromise by offering to watch a rom-com, as this offers each of you a bit of what you are looking for in that particular moment.
Note, however, that this style of argument is decidedly less common in academic settings, where various empirical or theoretical notions of truth are often prized above the practical advantages of the Rogerian method. While Aristotelian styles of argument are often seen as eristic concerned primarily with winningthe Rogerian argument can be viewed as more dialectic in nature a conversation between two or more parties with rogerian argument outline goal of arriving at some mutually-satisfying solution.
Thus, practicing the Rogerian argument will enhance your ability to understand the complex relations of opposing viewpoints and provide tools for addressing such discrepancies sympathetically. However, Rogerian argument does come with disadvantages. For example, because Rogerian argument relies on compromise between opposing parties, rogerian argument outline may not work well when your opponents are unwilling or unable rogerian argument outline compromise, or if they are arguing in bad faith e.
The first aim shows the reader that you understand the complexities of the argument and that you have listened sympathetically to what it is they have to say. This is important, rogerian argument outline, because the success of the Rogerian arguments relies on cooperation and collaboration. The second aim puts this understanding into practice by seeking a symbiotic solution. The third aim builds ethos and rapport between the parties.
If audiences believe they share a value system with a speaker or writer, they are more likely to agree to the terms of whatever solution is presented. While each of these aims is important, Young, Becker, rogerian argument outline, and Pike stress that they are just that: aims, rogerian argument outline, not steps.
You should not necessarily view these aims as occurring in a linear, step-by-step process. The authors present a synthesized discussion of what a successful Rogerian argument should contain, but they eschew any formalized structure. The structure of the argument should instead be determined by the speaker, and it should be modified and adapted according to the rhetorical situation at hand. Again, there is no formalized structure for the Rogerian argument, though the following example provides a foundation for considering how you might structure your own argument.
In this example, we will take the position that technology e. In so doing, we should be able to arrive at a solution that considers both arguments and develops a solution that benefits both parties while still achieving our goal of allowing technology in the classroom, rogerian argument outline. Here, we would introduce the topic and briefly discuss why it is a matter of contention.
We would lay out the differing perspectives, briefly mention the merits of each argument, and discuss the rogerian argument outline closely considering all perspectives to arrive at a solution that works for everyone.
Here, we would introduce the opposing position that digital technology should not be allowed in the writing classroom. We would also list and discuss their objections to the proposition of technology in the classroom. Here we might provide specific details that lend merit to their argument. We want to show that we rogerian argument outline fully considering their claims and not just giving lip service, in the hope that that they will give similar value to our opinions.
We could include statistics, testimony from instructors and students, or even examples from media that support their theory that digital technology can indeed be a distraction during instruction, rogerian argument outline. Here, we would introduce our claim that digital technology should be allowed in the writing classroom. We would still want to speak as objectively as possible in order to establish our ethos as concerned but unbiased speaker.
We might even qualify our position by acknowledging that there are, of course, situations in which technology should be put away, but reiterate that, generally speaking, the presence of digital technology is a positive. For example, we could gather testimony from students who claim that using these technologies in class has been beneficial.
We could include research and scholarship that supports our position and even quote instructors who have developed pedagogy around these technologies. We might even subtly demonstrate that our opposition has failed to account for all possibilities by choosing our examples carefully. For instance, we could easily include accounts of students with learning disabilities who might otherwise have a difficult time succeeding in class without the help of assistive technologies. We would acknowledge that some instructors do not want digital technologies present in the classroom, as they believe they distract from paying attention during lectures, rogerian argument outline.
We would maintain, however, that these technologies can indeed be productive tools for learning—in some cases, they can even be a virtual requirement for learning. We could then offer a solution: that these digital technologies should be kept aside during lecture portions of a lesson except in the case of students with documented disabilities.
This way, rogerian argument outline, students will likely rogerian argument outline paying attention, taking notes by hand which they can transcribe later if they so wish.
However, once a class moves from lecture to activity whether group or individualstudents should be allowed to access these technologies to more effectively engage with the activity, organize their thoughts, and access information. Now that the instructor is no longer lecturing, it should be easier to monitor student progress and engagement and the use of technology for rogerian argument outline activities will lead to more developed and better organized results from the students.
Find Info For Find Info For Academics Admissions Current Students Athletics About Careers Prospective Students Research rogerian argument outline Partnerships Quick Links Apply News President Shop Visit Give Rogerian argument outline. Purdue Online Writing Lab College of Liberal Arts.
Writing Lab Purdue OWL Research Contact Site Map. General Writing Academic Writing Rogerian argument outline Perspectives on Argumentation. Welcome to the Purdue OWL This page is brought to you by the OWL at Purdue University, rogerian argument outline. Rogerian Argument The Rogerian argument or Rogerian rhetoric is a form of rogerian argument outline reasoning that aims to establish a middle ground between parties with opposing viewpoints or goals.
Contents Again, there is no formalized structure for the Rogerian argument, though the following example provides a foundation for considering how you might structure your own argument. Introduction Here, we would introduce the topic and briefly discuss why it is a matter rogerian argument outline contention.
Opposing position Here, we would introduce the opposing position that digital technology should not be allowed in the writing classroom. Context for opposing position Here we might provide specific details that lend merit to their argument. Your Position Here, we would introduce our claim that digital technology should be allowed in the writing classroom.
Intro to Rogerian Argument
, time: 9:11Rogerian Argument Essay: Example, Topics, Outline
Rogerian Method of Argumentation Use this outline if you are looking at two sides of an issue and want to reach a compromise with the point of view that is opposite yours. I. Introduction 1. State the problem you hope to resolve. 2. Explain the type of positive change you would like to see pertaining to this issue. blogger.com Size: 60KB 10/1/ · Rogerian argument is a negotiating strategy in which common goals are identified and opposing views are described as objectively as possible in an effort to establish common ground and reach an agreement. It is also known as Rogerian rhetoric, Rogerian argumentation, Rogerian persuasion, and empathic blogger.com by: Rogerian Argument Outline. The Rogerian argument presents two sides of an issue and the common ground or compromise between the two sides. You will not take a stand on the issue. Please review the lecture notes on Rogerian argument before completing this blogger.comted Reading Time: 3 mins
No comments:
Post a Comment